Port of Townsville Limited Summary

[2013] FWCA 8932

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Port of Townsville Limited
(AG2013/10018)

PORT OF TOWNSVILLE LIMITED PORT SERVICES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013

Port authorities
COMMISSIONER SIMPSON	BRISBANE, 13 NOVEMBER 2013

Application for approval of the Port of Townsville Limited Port Services Enterprise Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Port of Townsville Limited Port Services Enterprise Agreement 2013. (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Port of Townsville. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Australian Maritime Officers Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 20 November 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2016.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Port of Townsville Limited brought an application to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Port of Townsville Limited Port Services Enterprise Agreement 2013. The respondents, who were employees of Port of Townsville Limited, contested the application, asserting various objections. The central issue before the court was whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval, particularly under the Fair Work Act 2009. Key concerns included whether the agreement adequately provided for the employees' pay and conditions, and whether the process for reaching the agreement was fair and in compliance with the legislative framework.

The Commission examined the evidence and submissions presented by both parties. It considered whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether the bargaining process was genuinely aimed at achieving an agreement. Additionally, the court assessed if the agreement provided for minimum rates of pay, classification, and other terms and conditions that were no less favourable than the applicable award or registered agreement. The respondents argued that the agreement did not sufficiently protect their interests, while Port of Townsville Limited maintained that the agreement was fair and complied with all necessary legal standards.

After reviewing the arguments and evidence, the Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was made in good faith and followed a fair bargaining process. It concluded that the agreement provided for terms and conditions that were no less favourable than those provided for in the relevant award. Therefore, the Commission approved the agreement as compliant with the statutory requirements. The court emphasised that the agreement was a genuine attempt to reach a fair and reasonable outcome for both parties, and it met all the necessary criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act.

Port of Townsville Limited

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established