| [2017] FWCA 3157 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Port of Townsville Limited
(AG2017/1702)
PORT OF TOWNSVILLE LIMITED MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Port authorities | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 8 JUNE 2017 |
Application for approval of the Port of Townsville Limited Maintenance Employees Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Port of Townsville Limited Maintenance Employees Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Port of Townsville Limited T/As Port of Townsville. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Maritime Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 15 June 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE424619 PR593618>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Port of Townsville Limited [2017] FWCA 3157
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 3157
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues the Commission needed to address were whether the agreement met the procedural requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009, and whether the agreement complied with the provisions of the Act, particularly in relation to minimum entitlements and procedural fairness. The union argued that certain clauses within the agreement did not adequately protect the employees' interests, while the employer contended that the agreement was fair and met all necessary legal standards.
The Commission examined the agreement in detail, considering both procedural compliance and substantive fairness. It was found that the agreement did not fully comply with the procedural requirements as it did not include all necessary information required by the Act. Additionally, certain clauses were deemed to be unfair as they did not provide adequate protection for employee entitlements. Consequently, the application for approval was dismissed. The Commission provided detailed reasons for its decision, highlighting the specific deficiencies in the agreement and the necessary steps for future compliance.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.