Ponticello (as executrix of the estate of the late Giorgio Gino Ponticello) v De Martin & Gasparini Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2010] NSWWCCPD 46
•4 May 2010
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Ponticello (as executrix of the estate of the late Giorgio Gino Ponticello) v De Martin & Gasparini Pty Ltd [2010] NSWWCCPD 46
[2010] NSWWCCPD 46
4 May 2010
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Ponticello, as executrix of the estate of the late Giorgio Gino Ponticello, pursued De Martin & Gasparini Pty Ltd in relation to compensation for pain and suffering following the death of a worker. The dispute was heard by the New South Wales Court of Appeal. The central legal issue revolved around the interpretation of section 67(5) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987, which pertains to the compensation for pain and suffering after the death of a worker. Specifically, the court had to determine whether the employer was liable for the compensation of pain and suffering that occurred prior to the death of the worker.
The court meticulously examined the statutory language and legislative intent behind section 67(5) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987. It was noted that the section explicitly states compensation for pain and suffering is not payable unless the worker has died. The court held that this meant compensation was not payable for any pain and suffering experienced by the worker before their death. It was determined that the statutory language clearly indicated that the compensation was intended for the period following the worker's death, not prior to it. Consequently, the employer was not liable for any pain and suffering that the worker endured before death.
As a result of the court's reasoning, the Certificate of Determination dated 28 October 2009 was confirmed, with the exception of paragraph 2, which was revoked and replaced with an award for the respondents. The final order was that De Martin & Gasparini Pty Ltd was not liable for the compensation of pain and suffering that occurred before the death of the worker. There was no order regarding the costs of the appeal.
The court meticulously examined the statutory language and legislative intent behind section 67(5) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987. It was noted that the section explicitly states compensation for pain and suffering is not payable unless the worker has died. The court held that this meant compensation was not payable for any pain and suffering experienced by the worker before their death. It was determined that the statutory language clearly indicated that the compensation was intended for the period following the worker's death, not prior to it. Consequently, the employer was not liable for any pain and suffering that the worker endured before death.
As a result of the court's reasoning, the Certificate of Determination dated 28 October 2009 was confirmed, with the exception of paragraph 2, which was revoked and replaced with an award for the respondents. The final order was that De Martin & Gasparini Pty Ltd was not liable for the compensation of pain and suffering that occurred before the death of the worker. There was no order regarding the costs of the appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Workers' Compensation Law
Legal Concepts
-
Compensation for Pain and Suffering
-
Statutory Interpretation
-
Breach of Contract
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Railcorp NSW v Registrar of the WCC of NSW [2013] NSWSC 231
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Railcorp NSW v Registrar of the WCC of NSW
[2013] NSWSC 231
Railcorp NSW v Registrar of the WCC of NSW
[2013] NSWSC 231
Cases Cited
10
Statutory Material Cited
0
Kraljevich v Lake View and Star Ltd
[1945] HCA 29
Jopa Pty Ltd t/as Tricia's Clip-n-Snip v Edenden
[2004] NSWWCCPD 50
Milosavljevic v Medina Property Services Pty Ltd
[2008] NSWWCCPD 56