[2014] FWCA 2419 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Polyseal Waterproofing (QLD) Pty Ltd
(AG2014/5101)
POLYSEAL WATERPROOFING QLD PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS | BRISBANE, 10 APRIL 2014 |
Application for approval of the Polyseal Waterproofing QLD Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015.
[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 27 March 2014 by Polyseal Waterproofing (QLD) Pty Ltd for the approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Polyseal Waterproofing QLD Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 (“the Agreement”).
[2] I consider that sub clause 35.3 of the Agreement (“employment security, staffing levels, mode of recruitment and replacement labour”) equally raises enforceability questions. In this respect, I explained in a separate previous decision - [2013] FWC 5033 - that such a clause, as it purports to restrict or qualify the employer’s right to use contractors or utilise contracted labour, may not comprise permitted content for the purposes of s.172 of the Act.
[3] For the avoidance of doubt, I note the following.
- Clauses 32.4 and 32.7 must be read in conjunction with Clause 40 of the Agreement. The relevant extract of Clause 40 is as follows:
“The right provided for in subclause 32.4 does not constitute an entitlement to hold discussions with one or more employees other than by way of the procedures stipulated in Part 3-4 of the Act.
The company will comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) in respect of any requests made under the subclause 32.7 to which that Act applies. The clause will not be exercised inconsistently with Part 3-4 of the FW Act 2009. However, the exercise of rights under this subclause does not necessarily invoke the operation of Part 3-4 in that information may be sought for purposes other than those identified in Part 3-4 and without the need for entry into workplaces.”
[4] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The consultation clause does not conform with s.205(1A) of the Act. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Regulations is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[6] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE407659 PR549560>
- AGLC
- Polyseal Waterproofing (QLD) Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 2419
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 2419
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the enterprise agreement complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it was fair and reasonable in all its terms. The court examined the provisions of the agreement, including the classification of employees, rates of pay, leave entitlements, and other conditions of employment. The court also considered the views of the parties and any relevant evidence presented.
The court found that the enterprise agreement was fair and reasonable in all its terms and complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. The court noted that the agreement provided for a reasonable classification of employees, adequate rates of pay, and appropriate leave entitlements. The court also found that the agreement was the product of genuine bargaining between the parties and was not prejudicial to the operation of the industrial relations system.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Polyseal Waterproofing QLD Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015, and it came into effect on 1 January 2011. The agreement provides for the terms and conditions of employment for employees of Polyseal Waterproofing (QLD) Pty Ltd for the period from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2015.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.