Police Federation of Australia v Victoria Police T/A Victoria Police

Case [2023] FWC 2914


[2023] FWC 2914

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Police Federation of Australia
v

Victoria Police T/A Victoria Police

(B2023/1210)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT WRIGHT

SYDNEY, 6 NOVEMBER 2023

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Victoria Police

  1. This is an application by the Police Federation of Australia (PFA Victoria Police Branch) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Victoria Police (Employer)

  1. On 6 November 2023, the Commission was advised that the parties have reached agreement in relation to a number of issues arising from the application and on the basis of this agreement, Victoria Police does not object to the application as amended by the Applicant.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Wayne Lee Gatt, CEO of the Police Federation of Australia, setting out the steps taken by the PFA Victoria Police Branch in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Employer, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. Based on the terms of the agreement reached between the parties, I am satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances justifying the period of written notice being longer than 3 working days in respect to the action described as ‘indefinite or periodic stoppages of work, including consecutive stoppages of work, provided it is safe to do so and does not impact on the delivery of essential policing services’. Pursuant to s.443(5) of the Act, the period of written notice for the purposes of s414(2)(b) of the Act is 5 working days for that action.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by TrueVote Pty Ltd. TrueVote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and is authorised to conduct the ballot.[1]

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 24 November 2023. This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. An order has been separately issued in PR768016.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives involved in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] TrueVote Pty Ltd [2023] FWC 1446.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR768015>

Details
AGLC
Police Federation of Australia v Victoria Police T/A Victoria Police [2023] FWC 2914
Case
[2023] FWC 2914
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Police Federation of Australia (PFA Victoria Police Branch) sought an order under section 437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for a protected action ballot, specifically concerning certain employees of Victoria Police. This application was brought before the Fair Work Commission. The application was filed under the Fair Work Act 2009, with the purpose of enabling the PFA Victoria Police Branch to conduct a ballot among its members for a proposed protected action, which included indefinite or periodic stoppages of work provided they did not compromise the delivery of essential policing services.

The legal issues the court had to address involved whether the PFA Victoria Police Branch had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Victoria Police and whether the proposed action met the requirements of the Act. Additionally, the court had to determine if there were exceptional circumstances that justified a longer notice period than the statutory minimum of three working days for the proposed action. The PFA Victoria Police Branch needed to demonstrate that they had been genuinely attempting to reach an agreement with Victoria Police and that they had met all requirements under the Act, including the notification period for the proposed action. The court also had to consider whether the period of written notice should be extended beyond the standard three working days for the proposed action, as the PFA Victoria Police Branch argued that exceptional circumstances warranted a longer period.

The court found that the PFA Victoria Police Branch had genuinely attempted to reach an agreement with Victoria Police and had met all requirements under the Act. The court was satisfied that the declaration provided by the CEO of the Police Federation of Australia, Wayne Lee Gatt, outlined the bargaining efforts and the genuine attempts to reach an agreement. Furthermore, the court determined that exceptional circumstances justified extending the notice period beyond the statutory minimum. Consequently, the court approved a five-working-day notice period for the proposed action of indefinite or periodic stoppages of work, provided it was safe to do so and did not affect the delivery of essential policing services. The court also approved TrueVote Pty Ltd as the ballot agent and set the closing date for voting as 24 November 2023.

The court issued an order granting the PFA Victoria Police Branch's application for a protected action ballot, with specific provisions for the notice period and the ballot agent. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission for a compulsory conciliation conference to ensure meaningful negotiations regarding the proposed enterprise agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.