Poisons and Drugs (Amendment) Act 1991 (ACT)

This case involved an appeal against a decision to revoke the appellant's registration as a pharmacist under the Poisons and Drugs Act 1978 (ACT). The legal issues were whether the decision to revoke the pharmacist's registration was valid and whether the decision-maker had considered all relevant matters. The court held that the decision to revoke the pharmacist's registration was valid as it was based on findings that the pharmacist had been dishonest and had acted in a way that brought the profession into disrepute. The court also held that the decision-maker had considered all relevant matters in reaching the decision. The appeal was dismissed.