Pohlner v Pfeiffer
Case
•
[1964] HCA 8
•25 February 1964
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Pohlner v Pfeiffer [1964] HCA 8
[1964] HCA 8
25 February 1964
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Pohlner v Pfeiffer concerned a dispute between the parties regarding a contract for the sale of land. The case was heard by the High Court of Australia.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the contract for the sale of land was void for uncertainty, specifically concerning the description of the land. The court was required to determine if the description provided in the contract was sufficiently clear to identify the subject matter of the sale.
The High Court held that the description of the land in the contract was sufficiently certain to be enforceable. The court applied the principle that a contract for the sale of land will not be void for uncertainty if the description, when read in conjunction with surrounding circumstances or by reference to external facts, allows the land to be identified with reasonable certainty. In this instance, the court found that the description, despite its initial ambiguity, was capable of being rendered certain by reference to extrinsic evidence.
The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the validity of the contract.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the contract for the sale of land was void for uncertainty, specifically concerning the description of the land. The court was required to determine if the description provided in the contract was sufficiently clear to identify the subject matter of the sale.
The High Court held that the description of the land in the contract was sufficiently certain to be enforceable. The court applied the principle that a contract for the sale of land will not be void for uncertainty if the description, when read in conjunction with surrounding circumstances or by reference to external facts, allows the land to be identified with reasonable certainty. In this instance, the court found that the description, despite its initial ambiguity, was capable of being rendered certain by reference to extrinsic evidence.
The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the validity of the contract.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Negligence & Tort
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Damages
-
Duty of Care
-
Negligence
-
Causation
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Pohlner v Pfeiffer [1964] HCA 8
Most Recent Citation
Re Thompson (dec'd); Lundstrom v Attorney-General for the State of Victoria [2006] VSC 313
Cases Citing This Decision
35
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
0
Miles v Miles
[2000] QCA 415
Gonzales v Claridades
[2003] NSWCA 227
Gonzales v Claridades
[2003] NSWCA 227