| [2014] FWCA 7801 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
PMR Quarries Pty Ltd trading as trustee for the WA Limestone Unit Trust T/A WA Limestone
(AG2014/9293)
W.A. LIMESTONE, W.A. BLUEMETAL & W.A. PREMIX WESTERN AUSTRALIAN ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Quarrying industry | |
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS | PERTH, 4 NOVEMBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the W.A. Limestone, W.A. Bluemetal & W.A. Premix Western Australian Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the W.A. Limestone, W.A. Bluemetal & W.A. Premix Western Australian Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by PMR Quarries Pty Ltd trading as trustee for the WA Limestone Unit Trust T/A WA Limestone. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 11 November 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 November 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE410960 PR557336>
- AGLC
- PMR Quarries Pty Ltd trading as trustee for the WA Limestone Unit Trust T/A WA Limestone [2014] FWCA 7801
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 7801
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues in the case were whether the agreements were made in good faith and whether they contained the required "safety net" provisions. Safety net provisions are essential to ensure that employees receive a minimum set of terms and conditions of employment, and are a critical aspect of Australian industrial relations law. The court had to examine the content of the agreements to ascertain if they provided these minimum protections and were negotiated in a manner that complied with the principles of good faith bargaining.
In reaching its decision, the court considered the submissions from both parties and the relevant legal principles. It was noted that the agreements had been negotiated between the parties and included provisions that were above the minimum safety net entitlements. The court also found that the agreements had been made in good faith, as evidenced by the extensive negotiations and the willingness of both parties to reach a resolution. Consequently, the court approved the agreements, finding that they met the necessary requirements for endorsement under the Fair Work Act 2009.
The final orders of the court were that the W.A. Limestone, W.A. Bluemetal, and W.A. Premix Western Australian Enterprise Agreement 2014 be approved and registered with the Fair Work Commission. This decision ensured that the terms of the agreements would apply to the relevant employees, providing them with the agreed-upon terms and conditions of employment.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.