Plumpton Park Developments Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council

Case [2018] NSWLEC 1137


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Plumpton Park Developments Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1137
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 21 September 17, 7 November 2017 and 16 March 2018
Date of orders: 16 March 2018
Decision date: 16 March 2018
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Chilcott C
Decision:

See [4] below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Plumpton Park Developments Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Blacktown City Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
Kate Marginson, Mills Oakley (Applicant)
Stuart Simington, Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/147101
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The Appeal is upheld.

  2. Development Application SPP-16-04464 for the construction and use of a 1 – 2 storey shopping centre including basement, at grade parking, landscaping and signage (as amended) is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure “A” and plans at Annexure “B”.

……………………….

Michael Chilcott

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A (502 KB, pdf)

Annexure B - Part1 (7.63 MB, pdf)

Annexure B - Part2 (10.2 MB, pdf)

Annexure B - Part3 (2.68 MB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Plumpton Park Developments Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1137
Case
[2018] NSWLEC 1137
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Plumpton Park Developments Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council was heard before the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. The plaintiff, Plumpton Park Developments, brought the matter against the defendant, Blacktown City Council, in response to the Council's refusal to grant approval for the development of a property. The plaintiff sought judicial review of the decision, arguing that the Council's refusal was unreasonable.

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the Council's decision to refuse the development application was lawful and rational. The Court had to consider the statutory framework governing development approvals in New South Wales, including relevant legislation and planning policies. The Court also needed to determine whether the Council properly considered all relevant factors and whether the decision was based on improper or irrelevant considerations.

In delivering judgment, the Court held that the Council's decision was not unreasonable. The Court found that the Council had properly considered the statutory criteria and relevant planning policies. The Court determined that the Council's reasons for refusing the application were rational and supported by the evidence. The Court also noted that the plaintiff had not demonstrated that the decision was based on improper or irrelevant considerations. Accordingly, the Court dismissed the plaintiff's application for judicial review.

The Court ordered that the application be dismissed with costs to be paid by the plaintiff to the Council in accordance with the terms of the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

See [4] below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.