Plum and Haigwood

In the matter of *Plum and Haigwood*, heard before Judge Small, the applicants, Plum and Haigwood, sought to bring contravention applications against the respondent. The precise nature of the alleged contraventions and the underlying dispute are not detailed in the provided text, beyond the fact that these applications were formally filed on 12 February 2015 and 26 February 2016.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the contravention applications, as filed by Plum and Haigwood, were valid and ought to proceed. The court was required to determine the merits of these applications based on the evidence and legal arguments presented.

Judge Small dismissed the Contravention Applications. The reasoning behind this dismissal is not elaborated upon in the provided extract, but the outcome signifies that the court found no grounds to uphold the applications as presented.