Pitte and Pitte (No. 2)

In *Pitte and Pitte (No. 2)*, the parties were husband and wife, and the dispute concerned applications to vary existing court orders relating to property settlement and costs. The matter came before Cronin J.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether to grant extensions of time for compliance with previous orders made on 18 November 2008 and 19 August 2008, and whether to grant the husband's application for costs. The court also considered the wife's request for leave to respond to submissions.

Cronin J varied the orders of 18 November 2008 and 19 August 2008 to extend the time for compliance by both the husband and the wife. The husband's application for costs was refused. The wife was granted leave to file responding submissions by a specified date. The remaining application before the court was otherwise dismissed.