Pitt and Roscoe
Case
•
[2017] FCCA 3189
•17 November 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Pitt and Roscoe [2017] FCCA 3189
[2017] FCCA 3189
17 November 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Pitt and Roscoe*, heard by Judge Young, the dispute concerned parenting arrangements for two children, X and Y. The father sought orders for equal shared parental responsibility and a specific time spent with the children, while the mother sought to relocate the children to Adelaide.
The court was required to determine the most appropriate parenting orders, specifically addressing issues of equal shared parental responsibility, the children's primary residence, the time the children would spend with the father, and whether the mother should be permitted to relocate the children's residence to Adelaide.
Judge Young ordered that the mother and father were to have equal shared parental responsibility for the children. The court further ordered that the children were to live with the mother but spend five nights per fortnight with the father. Crucially, the mother was prohibited from relocating the children's residence to Adelaide.
The court was required to determine the most appropriate parenting orders, specifically addressing issues of equal shared parental responsibility, the children's primary residence, the time the children would spend with the father, and whether the mother should be permitted to relocate the children's residence to Adelaide.
Judge Young ordered that the mother and father were to have equal shared parental responsibility for the children. The court further ordered that the children were to live with the mother but spend five nights per fortnight with the father. Crucially, the mother was prohibited from relocating the children's residence to Adelaide.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Pitt and Roscoe [2017] FCCA 3189
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
2