[2014] FWCA 2854 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Pioneer North Queensland Pty Ltd T/A Pioneer North Queensland or PNQ
(AG2014/795)
PIONEER NORTH QUEENSLAND ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Asphalt industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE | SYDNEY, 1 MAY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Pioneer North Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Pioneer North Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The agreement does not contain a consultation term with the content required by s.205(1) and (1A). Accordingly, in accordance with s.205(2), the model consultation term contained in Schedule 2.3 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the agreement.
[4] The Australian Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 8 May 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE407924 PR550148>
- AGLC
- Pioneer North Queensland Pty Ltd T/A Pioneer North Queensland or PNQ [2014] FWCA 2854
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 2854
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues were whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated and whether it was made in good faith. The employer argued that the agreement was the result of genuine negotiations and was made in good faith. The union contended that the negotiations were not genuine and that the agreement was not made in good faith due to alleged procedural irregularities and lack of proper consultation.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was genuinely negotiated and made in good faith. The Commission considered the evidence of the negotiations, the conduct of the parties, and the fairness of the agreement. It was determined that there was no evidence of procedural irregularities that would undermine the genuineness of the negotiations. The Commission also found that the employer had acted in good faith throughout the negotiation process, leading to the approval of the agreement.
The Fair Work Commission approved the Pioneer North Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2014, confirming its compliance with the relevant statutory requirements. The Commission's decision was based on the evidence presented, finding no basis to reject the application. This outcome ensures that the terms of the agreement will govern the employment conditions between the parties, subject to the provisions of the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.