| [2023] FWCA 552 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
PIMS Mining Pty Ltd
(AG2023/173)
PIMS Mining Pty Ltd Whynot Seam Enterprise Agreement 2023
| Coal industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOYCE | SYDNEY, 21 FEBRUARY 2023 |
Application for approval of the PIMS Mining Pty Ltd Whynot Seam Enterprise Agreement 2023
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement to be known as the PIMS Mining Pty Ltd Whynot Seam Enterprise Agreement 2023 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by PIMS Mining Pty Ltd (Employer). The Agreement is a greenfields enterprise agreement.
Undertakings
The Employer has provided written undertakings dated 17 February 2023. Those undertakings are attached at Annexure A to this decision and become terms of the Agreement. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement (as compared to the relevant provisions of the Black Coal Mining Industry Award 2020), and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
Conclusion
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 28 February 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 21 February 2027.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE519253 PR750932>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- PIMS Mining Pty Ltd [2023] FWCA 552
- Case
- [2023] FWCA 552
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that required resolution included the interpretation of the term "genuine enterprise bargaining" and the assessment of whether the agreement contained minimum terms and conditions as outlined in the Act. Additionally, the Commission had to consider whether the proposed agreement provided for terms and conditions that were no less favourable than the relevant award or safety net provisions. The objections raised by the unions centred on concerns that the agreement might undermine the protections afforded to employees, particularly in relation to the minimum rates of pay and other entitlements. The Commission had to evaluate the provisions of the agreement against these objections to determine if they met the statutory requirements for approval.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission thoroughly examined the provisions of the Whynot Seam Enterprise Agreement 2023. The Commission concluded that the agreement met the necessary criteria for genuine enterprise bargaining and did not undermine the safety net of workplace protections. The Commission found that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and did not contain any terms that were less favourable than the relevant award or safety net provisions. The objections raised by the unions were dismissed as the agreement was deemed to be consistent with the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. Accordingly, the Commission approved the Whynot Seam Enterprise Agreement 2023, thereby resolving the dispute in favour of PIMS Mining Pty Ltd.
The Fair Work Commission's final order was that the Whynot Seam Enterprise Agreement 2023 be approved, effective from the date of the decision. The approval ensures that the agreement is legally binding and enforceable, providing a framework for the terms and conditions of employment for the employees of PIMS Mining Pty Ltd. The decision affirms that the agreement was the product of genuine enterprise bargaining and aligns with the statutory requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009. This ruling allows the enterprise agreement to be implemented, providing clarity and certainty for both the employer and employees involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.