[2013] FWCA 2745 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement
Piling Contractors Pty Ltd
(AG2013/1023)
PILING CONTRACTORS PTY LTD ICHTHYS ONSHORE CONSTRUCTION GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT
Northern Territory | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HARRISON | SYDNEY, 3 MAY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Piling Contractors Pty Ltd Ichthys Onshore Construction Greenfields Agreement.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Piling Contractors Pty Ltd Ichthys Onshore Construction Greenfields Agreement (the Agreement). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement. It has been made by Piling Contractors Pty Ltd, the Australian Workers’ Union, the "Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union" known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union, and the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia.
[2] The application is made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.In particular, I am satisfied that the employee organisations, taken as a group, are entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[3] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 10 May 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 2 May 2017.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE401076 PR536266>
- AGLC
- Piling Contractors Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 2745
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 2745
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the Greenfields Agreement met all the necessary legal requirements and was fair and reasonable in its terms. The applicant had to demonstrate that the agreement was in compliance with statutory provisions and that it provided a fair balance of rights and obligations between the parties. The court needed to consider whether the agreement was transparent, free from any undue influence, and whether it reflected the mutual intentions of both parties.
The court undertook a detailed examination of the agreement, scrutinising its terms and the context in which it was negotiated and executed. It assessed the fairness of the terms, taking into account the commercial realities and the relative bargaining positions of the parties. The court concluded that the agreement was comprehensive, transparent, and did not contain any terms that were unfair or unreasonable. Given the thorough analysis and the evidence presented, the court found that the agreement was in compliance with all necessary legal requirements and was fair to both parties.
The court approved the Greenfields Agreement, thereby authorising its implementation as part of the Ichthys Onshore Construction project. This decision allowed the project to proceed with the construction works as outlined in the agreement, subject to its terms and the continued compliance with relevant laws and regulations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.