| [2023] FWCA 2012 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Pilbara Rail Maintenance Pty Ltd T/A Pilbara Rail Maintenance
(AG2023/1877)
PILBARA RAIL MAINTENANCE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2023
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER WILSON | MELBOURNE, 3 JULY 2023 |
Application for approval of the Pilbara Rail Maintenance Enterprise Agreement 2023
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Pilbara Rail Maintenance Enterprise Agreement 2023 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Pilbara Rail Maintenance Pty Ltd T/A Pilbara Rail Maintenance. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 10 July 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 3 July 2027.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE520608 PR763858>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Pilbara Rail Maintenance Pty Ltd T/A Pilbara Rail Maintenance [2023] FWCA 2012
- Case
- [2023] FWCA 2012
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues centred on whether the agreement complied with the requirements for a simplified procedure agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission needed to determine if the agreement contained all the necessary prescribed terms, was fairly negotiated, and was suitable for its intended purpose. Additionally, the court had to examine if the process of negotiation and agreement was conducted appropriately, and whether the agreement would have the intended effect of regulating the terms and conditions of employment fairly.
The Commission found that the agreement met all the necessary requirements. It contained all the prescribed terms and was fairly negotiated. The evidence showed that the agreement was suitable for its intended purpose and would regulate the terms and conditions of employment fairly. The process of negotiation and agreement was deemed to have been conducted appropriately. Therefore, the Fair Work Commission certified the agreement as a simplified procedure agreement, allowing it to be registered and enforced.
No further orders were required, as the certification of the agreement as a simplified procedure agreement completed the necessary legal process for its enforcement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.