Pietrobon v BMD Constructions Pty Ltd & Ors
Case
•
[2017] FCCA 1730
•27 July 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Pietrobon v BMD Constructions Pty Ltd & Ors [2017] FCCA 1730
[2017] FCCA 1730
27 July 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, Mr Pietrobon, brought proceedings against BMD Constructions Pty Ltd and two other respondents, alleging that he had been unlawfully dismissed from his employment. The dispute concerned the circumstances surrounding the termination of Mr Pietrobon's employment and whether that termination constituted an unfair dismissal under the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth). The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission.
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether Mr Pietrobon had been protected from unfair dismissal at the time of his termination. This involved determining whether he met the minimum employment period requirement, which was six months for employees of a small business. The Commission also had to consider whether the employer, BMD Constructions Pty Ltd, qualified as a small business for the purposes of the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth).
In reaching its decision, the Commission considered the definition of a small business employer under the Act, which generally includes employers with fewer than 15 employees. The evidence presented established that BMD Constructions Pty Ltd, at the relevant time, employed more than 15 employees. Consequently, the employer did not qualify as a small business. As Mr Pietrobon had been employed for more than six months, he met the minimum employment period requirement and was therefore protected from unfair dismissal.
The Commission found that Mr Pietrobon had been unfairly dismissed and made orders for remedies.
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether Mr Pietrobon had been protected from unfair dismissal at the time of his termination. This involved determining whether he met the minimum employment period requirement, which was six months for employees of a small business. The Commission also had to consider whether the employer, BMD Constructions Pty Ltd, qualified as a small business for the purposes of the *Fair Work Act 2009* (Cth).
In reaching its decision, the Commission considered the definition of a small business employer under the Act, which generally includes employers with fewer than 15 employees. The evidence presented established that BMD Constructions Pty Ltd, at the relevant time, employed more than 15 employees. Consequently, the employer did not qualify as a small business. As Mr Pietrobon had been employed for more than six months, he met the minimum employment period requirement and was therefore protected from unfair dismissal.
The Commission found that Mr Pietrobon had been unfairly dismissed and made orders for remedies.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Negligence & Tort
Legal Concepts
-
Duty of Care
-
Negligence
-
Causation
-
Damages
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
DYZ19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FedCFamC2G 73
Cases Citing This Decision
9
Cavanagh v Lexastar Pty Ltd
[2021] FCCA 2001
Singh v Minister for Immigration
[2019] FCCA 2337
AOO16 v Minister for Immigration
[2019] FCCA 1334
Cases Cited
12
Statutory Material Cited
5
Fair Work Ombudsman v Nerd Group Australia Pty Ltd
[2010] FMCA 569
Dube v Hills Community Options Inc
[2017] FCCA 976
MZWQU v Minister for Immigration
[2005] FMCA 1054