Pico Holdings Inc v Wave Vistas Pty Ltd

Case [2006] QCA 510


[2006] QCA 510

COURT OF APPEAL

McMURDO P

Appeal No 3589 of 2002

PICO HOLDINGS INC Appellant/Applicant
and
WAVE VISTAS PTY LTD First Respondent/First
(FORMERLY TURF CLUB AUSTRALIA PTY Respondent
LTD)
(ACN 088 729 819)
and

NATIONAL BANK LIMITED Second Respondent/

Second Respondent

BRISBANE

..DATE 01/12/2006

ORDER
MR M R BLAND (instructed by Gilbert & Tobin) for the appellant
MS R E KENNEDY (of Mallesons Stephen Jaques) for the first respondent

MR B T PORTER (instructed by Thynne & Macartney) for the second respondent

THE PRESIDENT: For the reasons that have clearly emerged in the discussion between me and counsel during this hearing, the appellant's tardiness in progressing this matter is now bordering on the inexcusable.

In those circumstances it is my view that the appropriate order is that the appellant file and serve its outline of argument by 4 p.m. on Friday 19 January 2007 and that the parties then comply with the directions of the Deputy Registrar (Appeals) to prepare the appeal for hearing.

If the appellant does not comply with that order, the appeal is to be struck out with costs without further order.

...

THE PRESIDENT: The reason for this mention has clearly been occasioned by the tardiness of the appellant but the parties do seem to be in negotiation with a view to settling the appeal. In those circumstances the appropriate order is that the appellant pay the respondents' costs of and incidental to today's hearing but I order that those costs be paid at the determination of the appeal, that is they are costs in any event.

-----

2   ORDER

Details
AGLC
Pico Holdings Inc v Wave Vistas Pty Ltd [2006] QCA 510
Case
[2006] QCA 510
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Pico Holdings Inc, an appellant, has appealed against a decision of the primary judge in the Supreme Court of Queensland, where Wave Vistas Pty Ltd (formerly Turf Club Australia Pty Ltd) and National Bank Limited were the respondents. The case pertains to a dispute involving the enforcement of a security interest over assets, specifically shares, held by Wave Vistas Pty Ltd. The appellant, Pico Holdings Inc, contends that it has a superior claim over the shares due to an earlier security interest.

The central legal issues before the court were the validity and priority of the security interests held by Pico Holdings Inc and Wave Vistas Pty Ltd over the shares in question. The court needed to determine whether Pico Holdings Inc's security interest was properly registered and if it had priority over Wave Vistas Pty Ltd's interest. Additionally, the court had to consider the effect of National Bank Limited's involvement as a secured creditor on the distribution of the proceeds from the sale of the shares.

The court reviewed the procedural history of the case and highlighted the appellant's delay in progressing the matter, which bordered on the inexcusable. Despite the appellant's tardiness, the court considered the possibility of settlement between the parties. The court ordered Pico Holdings Inc to file and serve its outline of argument by a specified deadline and to comply with the Deputy Registrar's directions to prepare the appeal for hearing. The court also ordered that if Pico Holdings Inc did not comply with the outlined order, the appeal would be struck out with costs. In light of the negotiations, the court ordered Pico Holdings Inc to pay the respondents' costs of the hearing, to be paid at the determination of the appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.