Pi v State of New South Wales (No 7)

The Plaintiff in this case sought to have a decision made earlier by the court set aside. The decision was made in the absence of the Plaintiff, who did not attend the earlier hearing. The matter was before the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The Defendant in the case was the State of New South Wales. The Plaintiff claimed that the earlier decision was wrong and wanted it changed. The State opposed the Plaintiff's application.

The court had to decide whether to allow the Plaintiff's application to have the earlier decision set aside. The court also had to decide if the Plaintiff's affidavit in support of the application was sufficient. The affidavit was almost entirely incomprehensible, and it was difficult for the court to understand what the Plaintiff was claiming. The Plaintiff did not attend the hearing for the application, and the court had to decide if the application should be dismissed because the Plaintiff did not appear.

The court held that the Plaintiff's application to set aside the earlier decision should be dismissed. The court found that the Plaintiff's affidavit was almost entirely incomprehensible, and the Plaintiff did not attend the hearing. The court held that the Plaintiff had not shown any reason why the earlier decision should be set aside. The court also held that the application was not in the interests of justice, and it was not appropriate to set aside the earlier decision. The court dismissed the application.