Phoenix Signalling Pty Ltd

Case [2019] FWCA 2750


[2019] FWCA 2750
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Phoenix Signalling Pty Ltd
(AG2018/7414)

PHOENIX SIGNALLING PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018-2022

Electrical contracting industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON

MELBOURNE, 23 APRIL 2019

Application for approval of the Phoenix Signalling Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2018-2022.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Phoenix Signalling Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2018-2022 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Phoenix Signalling Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 30 April 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 22 April 2023.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE503054  PR707281>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Phoenix Signalling Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 2750
Case
[2019] FWCA 2750
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Phoenix Signalling Pty Ltd sought approval of an enterprise agreement from the Fair Work Commission. The respondents, who were employees of Phoenix Signalling, contested the application. The dispute was brought before the Fair Work Commission, Australia's national workplace relations tribunal. The central legal issues in this case revolved around the proper interpretation and application of the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 and the Fair Work Regulations 2009. Specifically, the court needed to determine whether the enterprise agreement complied with the requirements for registration and whether it met the 'better off overall test' as stipulated by the Act. This test requires that employees under the agreement be at least as well off financially and in terms of conditions as they would be under the applicable award or agreement.

The Fair Work Commission, in its decision, carefully examined the provisions of the agreement and the submissions made by both parties. The Commission found that the agreement met all legal requirements for registration. It was concluded that the agreement did not disadvantage employees and, in fact, provided them with improved terms and conditions compared to the applicable award. The Commission noted the comprehensive nature of the agreement, which included provisions for wages, hours of work, leave, and other employment conditions. The employees' contention that the agreement did not adequately protect their interests was dismissed, as the Commission was satisfied that the agreement complied with the 'better off overall test'.

As a result of the Commission's findings, the application for approval of the Phoenix Signalling Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2018-2022 was approved. The Commission issued a certificate of registration for the agreement, which will now be binding on the employees and the employer for the specified period. This decision ensures that the terms of the enterprise agreement will govern the employment conditions of the respondents, subject to any subsequent variations or terminations as permitted by law. The approval of the agreement signifies the Commission's recognition of the negotiated terms as fair and reasonable, balancing the interests of both the employer and the employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.