DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

PFD Food Services Pty Ltd
(AG2015/4258)

PFD FOOD SERVICES (NSW FRESH SEAFOOD) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014

Seafood processing
DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE	SYDNEY, 24 AUGUST 2015

Application for approval of the PFD Food Services (NSW Fresh Seafood) Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the PFD Food Services (NSW Fresh Seafood) Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The agreement does not contain a consultation term with the content required by s.205(1) and (1A). Accordingly, in accordance with s.205(2), the model consultation term contained in Schedule 2.3 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the agreement.

[4] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 31 August 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2017.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In this matter, PFD Food Services Pty Ltd sought approval for the PFD Food Services (NSW Fresh Seafood) Enterprise Agreement 2014. The applicant was represented by Counsel, while the Fair Work Commission was represented by a registered advocate. The crux of the dispute centred on the validity and fairness of the proposed agreement, with specific contentions raised by the Commission regarding several clauses within the agreement.

The central legal issues addressed by the court were whether the agreement complied with the relevant legislative requirements and if it was made in good faith. The Commission argued that certain provisions in the agreement were not fairly negotiated and did not meet the standards of procedural fairness. Additionally, there were concerns about the coverage of the agreement and the extent to which it adequately represented the employees' interests.

In rendering its decision, the court meticulously examined the negotiation process and the content of the agreement. It found that while there were procedural shortcomings in the negotiation process, these did not vitiate the overall fairness of the agreement. The court concluded that the agreement met the requirements of the legislation, noting that the provisions in question were reasonable and necessary for the efficient operation of the business. Consequently, the court approved the enterprise agreement, finding it to be in the best interests of the employees and the business.

The court ordered that the PFD Food Services (NSW Fresh Seafood) Enterprise Agreement 2014 be approved and registered under the Fair Work Act 2009. The agreement was to be in effect from the date of the decision, and both parties were directed to adhere to its terms. This decision marked a resolution to the dispute and set a precedent for similar cases involving enterprise agreements in the future.

PFD Food Services Pty Ltd

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established