Petridis and Petridis

In the matter of *Petridis and Petridis*, heard by McClelland DCJ, the dispute concerned the applicability of specific dispute resolution procedures to a disagreement between the parties. The Fourth Respondent initiated proceedings with an Application in a Case dated 2 July 2019, which the wife responded to with an oral application and an affidavit filed on 4 July 2019.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the dispute resolution procedures stipulated in paragraph (d) of the "Terms of Proposed Sale of Real Estate" document, annexed to consent orders made on 3 July 2018, were applicable to the dispute that had arisen. This required the court to interpret the scope and intent of the dispute resolution clause in light of the subsequent application.

McClelland DCJ reasoned that the dispute resolution procedures outlined in paragraph (d) were indeed applicable to the current disagreement. Consequently, the court dismissed both the Fourth Respondent's Application in a Case dated 2 July 2019 and the wife's subsequent oral application and affidavit. The court declared that the specified dispute resolution procedures were applicable to the dispute.