Peroni and Kappa
Case
•
[2017] FamCA 613
•17 August 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Peroni and Kappa [2017] FamCA 613
[2017] FamCA 613
17 August 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Peroni and Kappa*, Rees J considered an application for interim property settlement between a husband and wife. The dispute concerned the division of assets pending final determination of substantive proceedings.
The court was required to determine the appropriate interim property settlement orders, including the payment of a sum of money from the wife to the husband, and the facilitation of a loan by the wife secured against a jointly owned property. Furthermore, the court had to consider the consequences and procedure for the sale of another property if the wife failed to meet her payment obligations.
Rees J ordered that the wife pay $100,000 to the husband within 28 days as an interim property settlement. The husband was also ordered to sign documents to enable the wife to raise a $100,000 loan secured against a property at B Street, Suburb C, with the wife solely responsible for repayment. In the event the wife failed to make the ordered payment, both parties were to take steps to sell the property at D Street, Suburb E. The proceeds of this sale were to be applied first to the costs of sale, then $100,000 to the husband, $100,000 to the wife, and any remaining balance was to be held in a controlled money account pending further order.
The court was required to determine the appropriate interim property settlement orders, including the payment of a sum of money from the wife to the husband, and the facilitation of a loan by the wife secured against a jointly owned property. Furthermore, the court had to consider the consequences and procedure for the sale of another property if the wife failed to meet her payment obligations.
Rees J ordered that the wife pay $100,000 to the husband within 28 days as an interim property settlement. The husband was also ordered to sign documents to enable the wife to raise a $100,000 loan secured against a property at B Street, Suburb C, with the wife solely responsible for repayment. In the event the wife failed to make the ordered payment, both parties were to take steps to sell the property at D Street, Suburb E. The proceeds of this sale were to be applied first to the costs of sale, then $100,000 to the husband, $100,000 to the wife, and any remaining balance was to be held in a controlled money account pending further order.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Equity & Trusts
Legal Concepts
-
Injunction
-
Remedies
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Peroni and Kappa [2017] FamCA 613
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1