Percell and Mulroy

This matter came before Johnston J concerning a dispute between Percell and Mulroy. The specific nature of the dispute is not detailed, but the orders indicate a costs assessment application by Ms Mulroy had been previously listed but was vacated.

The primary legal issue before the court was the determination of Ms Mulroy's costs assessment application. The court was also required to consider whether to discharge a previous order made on 18 July 2016 and to reserve judgment on a child support issue.

Johnston J noted that the costs assessment application had been vacated, apparently in error, and therefore relisted the application for mention and directions before Registrar Mordaunt. The court discharged paragraph 3.2 of the orders of 18 July 2016 and reserved its judgment on the child support issue.