[2013] FWCA 5741 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Pentair Water and Environmental Systems Pty Ltd
(AG2013/1688)
PENTAIR WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS CURRUMBIN PRODUCT CENTRE, ENTERPRISE AGREMENT 2013
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT DRAKE | SYDNEY, 15 AUGUST 2013 |
Application for approval of the Pentair Water and Environmental Systems Currumbin Product Centre, Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Pentair Water and Environmental Systems Currumbin Product Centre, Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Pentair Water and Environmental Systems Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement was lodged within 14 days after it was made.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to the application for approval have been met.
[4] The Australian Workers’ Union, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers that organisation.
[5] On 8 August 2013 an undertaking was provided which is annexed to this decision and marked “Annexure A”.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s54 of the Act, will operate from 22 August 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2015.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE403129 PR540254>
- AGLC
- Pentair Water and Environmental Systems Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 5741
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 5741
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the agreement provided for minimum terms and conditions that were fair and reasonable. The Commission examined various aspects of the agreement, including the proposed pay rates, classification of employees, and other terms and conditions of employment. The Commission also considered submissions from both parties and relevant precedent.
After considering the evidence and submissions, the Commission concluded that the proposed agreement did provide for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for above-award rates of pay and other benefits for employees, and that the parties had engaged in genuine bargaining. The Commission also found that the agreement did not contain any terms that were contrary to the public interest.
The Fair Work Commission approved the proposed agreement, subject to certain modifications to address minor technical issues. The modifications did not alter the overall fairness of the agreement, and the Commission was satisfied that it met the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The parties were directed to implement the agreement, with the modifications, as soon as practicable.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.