Penson v Titan National Pty Ltd (No 3)
Case
•
[2015] NSWCA 121
•26 June 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Penson v Titan National Pty Ltd (No 3) [2015] NSWCA 121
[2015] NSWCA 121
26 June 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Penson v Titan National Pty Ltd (No 3)*, JC Campbell AJA considered an application for a gross sum costs order and the inclusion of GST within that order, as well as the appropriate form of order for interest on costs. The dispute arose from an extensive history of litigation between the parties concerning costs.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether a gross sum costs order should be made pursuant to s 98(4)(c) of the *Civil Procedure Act 2005* (NSW), and whether such an order should be inclusive of GST. Additionally, the court was required to determine the appropriate form of order for interest on costs pursuant to s 101 of the *Civil Procedure Act 2005* (NSW) when a gross sum costs order is made.
The court ultimately ordered that the applicant pay the costs of the respondents, assessed at $11,800. The court further ordered that the applicant pay interest on these costs at the rates prescribed for the purposes of s 101 of the *Civil Procedure Act 2005* (NSW). This interest was to commence running from the date the respondents had paid the whole of the costs and disbursements itemised in a specific memorandum of costs and disbursements, which was annexed to an affidavit sworn on 4 May 2015.
The primary legal issues before the court were whether a gross sum costs order should be made pursuant to s 98(4)(c) of the *Civil Procedure Act 2005* (NSW), and whether such an order should be inclusive of GST. Additionally, the court was required to determine the appropriate form of order for interest on costs pursuant to s 101 of the *Civil Procedure Act 2005* (NSW) when a gross sum costs order is made.
The court ultimately ordered that the applicant pay the costs of the respondents, assessed at $11,800. The court further ordered that the applicant pay interest on these costs at the rates prescribed for the purposes of s 101 of the *Civil Procedure Act 2005* (NSW). This interest was to commence running from the date the respondents had paid the whole of the costs and disbursements itemised in a specific memorandum of costs and disbursements, which was annexed to an affidavit sworn on 4 May 2015.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Tax Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Boros v Pages Property Investments Pty Ltd, in the matter of Boros (No 2) [2021] FedCFamC2G 377
Cases Citing This Decision
92
Michael Wilson & Partners v Emmott (No 2)
[2024] NSWCA 309
Ahern v Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd (No 2)
[2022] NSWCA 39
Bechara trading as Bechara and Company v Bates
[2016] NSWCA 294
Cases Cited
15
Statutory Material Cited
1
Penson v Titan National Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2015] NSWCA 120
Australasian Performing Rights Association Ltd v Marlin
[1999] FCA 1006
Hadid v Lenfest Communications Inc
[2000] FCA 628
Cited Sections