PENCIOUS & SEARLE

In the matter of *Pencious & Searle*, heard before Macmillan J, the husband sought an injunction to restrain Mr Woods, who was acting as counsel for the wife, from appearing in the proceedings.

The central legal issue before the court was whether Mr Woods should be prohibited from representing the wife due to alleged conflicts of interest or other impropriety.

Macmillan J dismissed the husband's application. The reasons for this dismissal are not detailed in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that the court found no sufficient grounds to grant the injunction sought by the husband.

Consequently, the court ordered that the husband's oral application for an injunction be dismissed.