Pencious & Pencious
Case
•
[2010] FamCA 605
•20 July 2010
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Pencious & Pencious [2010] FamCA 605
[2010] FamCA 605
20 July 2010
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Pencious & Pencious*, the Honourable Justice Cronin considered an application by the husband and responses filed by the wife and her parents. The precise nature of the dispute is not detailed, but the orders suggest it involved a family law matter where the wife's parents had some involvement or interest.
The court was required to determine the fate of the husband's application and the responses filed by the wife and her parents. The orders indicate that the court had to decide whether to uphold or dismiss these respective filings.
Justice Cronin dismissed the husband's application filed on 26 February 2010. Furthermore, the court dismissed the responses filed by the wife and her parents on 19 April 2010, with the exception of any issues relating to costs. The court also certified that it was appropriate for a party to be represented by counsel.
The court was required to determine the fate of the husband's application and the responses filed by the wife and her parents. The orders indicate that the court had to decide whether to uphold or dismiss these respective filings.
Justice Cronin dismissed the husband's application filed on 26 February 2010. Furthermore, the court dismissed the responses filed by the wife and her parents on 19 April 2010, with the exception of any issues relating to costs. The court also certified that it was appropriate for a party to be represented by counsel.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Pencious & Pencious [2010] FamCA 605
Most Recent Citation
Olindo & Donati [2023] FedCFamC2F 1367
Cases Citing This Decision
12
Searle & Pencious
[2016] FamCA 135
Nghiem & Truong & Anor
[2012] FamCA 550
Aitken & Murphy
[2011] FamCA 785
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
1
B Pty Ltd and Ors & K and Anor
[2008] FamCAFC 113
Valceski v Valceski
[2007] NSWSC 440