PELSTON & PELSTON

In the matter of *Pelston & Pelston*, heard by Judge Newbrun, the dispute concerned interim parenting arrangements, specifically the mother's application to relocate the children's residence. The court was required to make orders concerning the children's time with each parent and related matters pending further determination.

The central legal issues before the court were how to best promote the welfare and interests of the children, X (born 2010) and Y (born 2013), in light of the proposed relocation by the mother. This involved determining appropriate interim time arrangements, communication protocols between the parents, and specific orders regarding the children's schooling, medical care, and the parents' conduct towards each other and the children.

The court's reasoning led to a comprehensive set of interim orders designed to balance the children's relationship with both parents while permitting the mother's relocation under specific conditions. These orders detailed an alternating weekend schedule for the father during school terms, divided holiday periods, and specific arrangements for public holidays and pupil-free days. The court also imposed strict injunctions on the parents regarding communication, the discussion of proceedings with the children, and denigration of the other parent. Furthermore, the mother was permitted to relocate to a specified area, provided she gave the father written notice and confirmed school enrolment. The father was also ordered to undergo a psychiatric assessment, and both parents were directed to provide medical reports concerning the father's health. Communication was to be primarily through the "Our Family Wizard" app, with specific exceptions.