Pegler on behalf of the Widi People of the Nebo Estate #1 v State of Queensland (No 2)
Case
•
[2019] FCA 1159
•31 July 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Pegler on behalf of the Widi People of the Nebo Estate #1 v State of Queensland (No 2) [2019] FCA 1159
[2019] FCA 1159
31 July 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case of Pegler on behalf of the Widi People of the Nebo Estate #1 v State of Queensland (No 2) involves an application for a consent determination of native title under section 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth). The dispute concerns the native title rights of the Widi People over a specified Determination Area in Queensland. The key legal issues the court had to decide were whether the parties had satisfied the criteria set out in section 87 of the Native Title Act and whether it was appropriate for the court to make an order in terms of the agreement reached by the parties. The Federal Court was satisfied that the parties had indeed met the criteria and that making the order was appropriate.
In its determination, the Court specified the Determination Area, confirmed the existence of native title in relation to this area, and identified the Widi People as the native title holders. The Court outlined the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to the land and waters of the Determination Area, including rights to possession, occupation, use, and enjoyment of the area, as well as non-exclusive rights such as hunting, fishing, gathering, and taking water for personal, domestic, and non-commercial communal purposes. The Court also clarified the relationship between native title rights and other interests such as mining leases, telecommunications facilities, and public roads.
The Court's reasoning was based on the agreement between the parties, the evidence presented, and the legal framework provided by the Native Title Act. The outcome was that the Court made a determination in the terms set out in the agreement, recognising the native title rights and interests of the Widi People over the specified Determination Area. The Court also ordered that each party bear their own costs.
In its determination, the Court specified the Determination Area, confirmed the existence of native title in relation to this area, and identified the Widi People as the native title holders. The Court outlined the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to the land and waters of the Determination Area, including rights to possession, occupation, use, and enjoyment of the area, as well as non-exclusive rights such as hunting, fishing, gathering, and taking water for personal, domestic, and non-commercial communal purposes. The Court also clarified the relationship between native title rights and other interests such as mining leases, telecommunications facilities, and public roads.
The Court's reasoning was based on the agreement between the parties, the evidence presented, and the legal framework provided by the Native Title Act. The outcome was that the Court made a determination in the terms set out in the agreement, recognising the native title rights and interests of the Widi People over the specified Determination Area. The Court also ordered that each party bear their own costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Indigenous Peoples & Native Title Law
Legal Concepts
-
Native Title
-
Native Title Determination
-
Native Title Holders
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Widi Aboriginal Corporation (RNTBC) v Aurora Gold Mines Pty Ltd [2022] NNTTA 72
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Widi Aboriginal Corporation (RNTBC) v Aurora Gold Mines Pty Ltd
[2022] NNTTA 72
Widi Aboriginal Corporation (RNTBC) v Aurora Gold Mines Pty Ltd
[2022] NNTTA 72
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
3