Pederson & Anor v Parramatta City Council

Case [2007] NSWLEC 61



Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: Pederson & Anor v Parramatta City Council [2007] NSWLEC 61
PARTIES:

APPLICANT
Patrick and Patricia Pederson

RESPONDENT
Parramatta City Council
FILE NUMBER(S): 10644 of 2006
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Continuation of use of a brothel / swingers club, BCA compliance, amenity of area.
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
DATES OF HEARING: 9/11/2006, 8/01/2007, 19/01/2007, 1/02/2007 and 9/02/2007
 
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 

12 February 2007
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:

APPLICANT
Mr M. Baird, barrister

RESPONDENT
Mr P. Matincowitz, solicitor
of Abbott Tout



JUDGMENT:

      THE LAND AND
      ENVIRONMENT COURT
      OF NEW SOUTH WALES

      Hussey C

      12 February 2007

      10644 of 2006 Patrick and Patricia Pederson v
                  Parramata City Council

      JUDGMENT

      Background

1 This appeal was lodged against council’s refusal of a development application for the continuing use of a brothel and swingers club at No. 18 Ferndell Street, Granville.

2 This proposal had previously been assessed by the Land and Environment Court and on appeal, a conditional development consent was granted on 24 April 2005 subject to the conditions including:

          2. This consent is given a period of twelve (12) months only. A further development consent must be obtained to extend the use beyond this period.

3 On 13th June 2006 Development Application 485/2006 was lodged with Parramatta City Council for the continued operation of the brothel and swingers club approved by the Court. The applicant also sought approval for clients to be served complimentary drinks and to bring their own drinks such as wine to the premises for their consumption. The development application was publicly notified by Council on two occasions resulting in two letters of objection. One of the objection letters relates to multiple development applications and is irrelevant to the development proposed for the subject property.

4 For the appeal a number of issues were identified and the parties agreed to Mr L Winnacott being the Court-appointed expert for planning. He prepared a detailed assessment referred to as (Exhibit B), and concluded the proposal merited consent.


      The site

5 The site is at 18 Ferndell Street, South Granville and is described as Lot 36 in DP 14788. The site is rectangular in shape with a frontage to Ferndell Street of 14.93 m and depth of 36.575 m. The total area of the land is 544 sq m, and the building excluding internal car spaces is 246 sq m.

6 The proposal utilises the existing industrial warehouse currently located on the site. The building is constructed of brick, with concrete floors at the ground level and a suspended mezzanine timber floor with a metal roof.

7 Ferndell Street is surrounded by industrial uses comprising mainly manufacturing and warehousing uses. Adjoining the site on both sides and opposite the street are industrial uses. The development on the opposite side of the street consists of a large-scale industrial plant.


      The proposal

8 The proposal is Development Application 485/2006. It seeks approval for the continued use of an existing warehouse building as a swingers club and brothel. The applicant proposes the following operation requirements for the premises:

      • Hours of operation being 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.
      • The club would provide five car spaces on site, including one for the disabled.
      • A maximum of two sex workers would operate on the premises at any one time (probably one male and one female).
      • Five private bedrooms would be provided, including one with facilities for the disabled. Two of the bedrooms would have their own ensuite privately accessed.
      • There would be one receptionist on site at all times, as well as a part time contract cleaner.

9 The following change is proposed by the applicant in respect to the activity compared to the previous Court Approved Development Consent.

      • The serving of 1 glass of alcohol to patrons / visitors per hour as well as approval for visitors to bring their own alcohol onto the site.

      Planning controls

10 The subject site is within Zone No. 4 – Employment in Parramatta Local Environmental Plan 2001 (the LEP). Whilst the swingers club is not defined in the LEP, it could be defined as a Recreational Facility, which along with the Brothel are uses that are permissible subject to development consent with this zone.

11 Clause 24 of the LEP outlines specific siting requirements for Brothels.

12 The proposed development is subject to the requirements of Parramatta Development Control Plan 2005 (the DCP). The relevant sections of the DCP pertaining to this appeal are Land Contamination (s 4.1.8), Social Amenity (s 4.4), Visual and Acoustic Privacy (s 4.3.2), Safety and Security (s 4.4.2), Access for People with Disabilities (s 4.3.1), Parking (s 4.5.1).


      The evidence

13 The appeal commenced with a view and the parties agreed that the matter be completed by way of an on-site hearing (OSH). After hearing the evidence, the objectors and undertaking the view, I gave preliminary findings that the proposal could granted conditional consent subject to satisfactory amendments to address BCA requirements and the landscaping works being clarified.

14 The parties agreed to an adjournment to facilitate these amendments.

15 A number of amendments were made, resulting in the plan being referred to the Department of Planning in respect of classification of the building under the BCA and what associated fire safety measures were to be included. A difference of opinion was expressed as to whether the building should provide fire safety for a Class 6 or Class 9(b) building.

16 Subsequently further amended plans were filed on 8 February 2007. These plans specifically address the emergency fire exit concerns by the provision of a new, recessed, outward opening door from the lounge area, which is fitted with the appropriate panic bar. I understand from the submissions that this specification complies the BCA requirement for this class of building.


      Conclusion

17 Having considered the evidence, I am now satisfied that the consent can be granted subjected to the agreed conditions. The proposal was initially assessed and on its merits, approved for the trial period.

18 It is apparent that no substantive matters have been raised against this proposal as a result of the trial period operation that would warrant its refusal.

19 Insofar as objections were raised about the character of the area and possible use of alcohol on the premises, the conditions of consent are imposed to retrict this possibility.

20 In the ultimate, I accept that the final amendments on the plan filed 8 February 2007 satisfactorily address the BCA requirements, so as to enable final consent. In reaching this conclusion, I note that Mr Winnacott and Mr A Cowell (council’s senior development assessment officer) agreed that if the premises were operated in accordance with the management plan and the aforementioned BCA upgrading works were completed, then the health safety and security of occupants would be satisfactory for the consent and accordingly the following orders are made.


      Court orders

          1. The appeal is allowed.

          2. Development consent is granted for DA 485/2006 for the use of the premises at 18 Ferndell Street, Granville, as a brothel and swingers club, subject to the conditions in Annexure ‘A’.

          3. The exhibits may be returned except fort Exhibits 1, 4, A, B and C.

___________________

      R Hussey
      Commissioner of the Court
      Rjs/lr
Details
AGLC
Pederson v Parramatta City Council [2007] NSWLEC 61
Case
[2007] NSWLEC 61
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Patrick and Patricia Pederson, the applicants, sought approval from Parramatta City Council to continue operating a brothel and swingers club at No. 18 Ferndell Street, Granville. The proposal had been previously assessed by the Land and Environment Court, which granted conditional development consent on 24 April 2005, subject to specific conditions, including a twelve-month limitation on the use. The applicants lodged a new development application on 13 June 2006, seeking continued operation of the brothel and swingers club, with additional approval for serving complimentary drinks and allowing clients to bring their own alcohol to the premises. The council refused the application, leading the applicants to appeal to the Land and Environment Court.

The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether the development application should be granted, taking into account the Building Code of Australia (BCA) compliance, the zoning regulations under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and the amenity of the surrounding area. The court also needed to determine if the proposed changes, such as serving alcohol, would impact the community's welfare and if the conditions imposed by the council were appropriate.

The court, after considering the evidence and the detailed assessment by the court-appointed expert, concluded that the proposal could be granted conditional consent subject to certain conditions. The court found that the trial period operation did not raise any substantive concerns that would warrant refusal of the proposal. The court accepted that the final amendments, particularly addressing the BCA requirements, satisfactorily ensured the health, safety, and security of the occupants. The court was also satisfied that the conditions imposed would adequately restrict any potential negative impacts on the character of the area and the use of alcohol on the premises.

Accordingly, the court allowed the appeal and granted development consent for the use of the premises at 18 Ferndell Street, Granville, as a brothel and swingers club, subject to the conditions outlined in Annexure 'A'. The exhibits were to be returned, except for specific exhibits referenced in the judgment. This decision effectively permits the continuation of the brothel and swingers club operations, provided that the applicants adhere to the stipulated conditions.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.