Peck and Peck (No.3)
Case
•
[2017] FCCA 2357
•30 October 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Peck and Peck (No.3) [2017] FCCA 2357
[2017] FCCA 2357
30 October 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Peck and Peck (No.3)*, Judge Willis of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia considered an application for costs by the Husband. The specific nature of the underlying dispute between the parties, beyond the context of a costs application, is not detailed in the provided text.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the Husband was entitled to an order for costs. This required the court to assess the circumstances surrounding the proceedings and determine if an award of costs was warranted in favour of the Husband.
Judge Willis dismissed the Husband's application for costs. The court also ordered that all outstanding applications be removed from the pending cases list, effectively bringing an end to the matters before the court.
The central legal issue before the court was whether the Husband was entitled to an order for costs. This required the court to assess the circumstances surrounding the proceedings and determine if an award of costs was warranted in favour of the Husband.
Judge Willis dismissed the Husband's application for costs. The court also ordered that all outstanding applications be removed from the pending cases list, effectively bringing an end to the matters before the court.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Res Judicata
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Peck and Peck (No.3) [2017] FCCA 2357
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
4
Penfold v Penfold
[1980] HCA 4
Mallet v Mallet
[1984] HCA 21
Fields & Smith
[2015] FamCAFC 57