Pearce and Pearce

In *Pearce and Pearce*, Dawe J of the Supreme Court of Victoria was required to determine the appropriate valuation of certain assets in a proceeding between the parties. The specific dispute concerned the retrospective valuation of assets, with an affidavit filed by Mr G on 13 March 2013 setting out these valuations.

The central legal issue before the Court was the admissibility and weight to be given to the retrospective valuations presented by Mr G. The Court had to consider how these valuations should be treated in the context of the ongoing dispute between the parties.

Dawe J ordered that the affidavit of Mr G, containing the retrospective valuations, be received by the Court. This indicates that the Court accepted the affidavit as evidence to be considered in its determination of the matter. The precise impact of these valuations on the final resolution of the dispute is not detailed in the provided text.