Pearce and Munro and Anor
Case
•
[2017] FCCA 612
•24 March 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Pearce and Munro and Anor [2017] FCCA 612
[2017] FCCA 612
24 March 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Pearce and Munro and Anor*, heard by Judge Wilson, the dispute concerned parenting orders. The parties sought to vary existing orders and have new, final parenting orders made by consent.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether to discharge an existing order and, by consent, make new final parenting orders in terms of a Minute of Consent Orders signed by the parties.
Judge Wilson discharged Order 17 of the Minute of Consent Orders made on 11 March 2015. The Court then made final parenting orders by consent in terms of the Minute of Consent Orders signed by the parties and dated 24 March 2017. The Minute was to be placed on the Court file, and the solicitors for the applicant were directed to engross the Minute and deliver a certified electronic copy to the Court within seven days. Upon delivery, the orders were to be extracted and the copy attached. All other extant applications were dismissed.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether to discharge an existing order and, by consent, make new final parenting orders in terms of a Minute of Consent Orders signed by the parties.
Judge Wilson discharged Order 17 of the Minute of Consent Orders made on 11 March 2015. The Court then made final parenting orders by consent in terms of the Minute of Consent Orders signed by the parties and dated 24 March 2017. The Minute was to be placed on the Court file, and the solicitors for the applicant were directed to engross the Minute and deliver a certified electronic copy to the Court within seven days. Upon delivery, the orders were to be extracted and the copy attached. All other extant applications were dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Consent
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
2