| [2014] FWCA 5175 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s 185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Paynesville & District Financial Services Limited
(AG2014/1821)
PAYNESVILLE & DISTRICT FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Banking finance and insurance industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS | SYDNEY, 1 AUGUST 2014 |
Application for approval of the Paynesville & District Financial Services Limited Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’), filed by Paynesville & District Financial Services Limited (the ‘applicant’) which seeks the approval of the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the Paynesville & District Financial Services Limited Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the ‘Agreement’). The Agreement was negotiated with one non-Union Employee Bargaining Representative and is to cover 5 employees, other than managerial employees, who are engaged in clerical roles at the applicant’s community banking franchise in Paynesville, Victoria. For the purposes of s 186(3) of the Act, I am satisfied that the group of employees to be covered by this Agreement has been fairly chosen.
[2] The employees were last notified of their representational rights on 19 May 2014, and voting for the Agreement’s approval took place on 4 July 2014. The time limits under s 181(2) of the Act are thereby satisfied. In a ballot, all 5 of the employees agreed to approve the Agreement. The application for approval of the Agreement was lodged on 17 July 2014, thereby satisfying s 185(3) of the Act.
[3] In the Employer’s Declaration in support of the application (Form F17) Ms M Beazer, Author and member of the applicant’s Board, identified the Banking, Finance and Insurance Award 2010 [MA000019] as the relevant reference instruments for the purposes of the Better Off Overall Test (the ‘BOOT’). Ms Beazersaid that the Agreement does contain one term that is less beneficial than that under the Award, in that employees will be eligible for a higher duties allowance after performing duties at a higher position for five, rather than four days. However, the Agreement provides for a number of terms and conditions that are more beneficial than, or in excess of the Award, including higher base rates of pay, higher junior rates of pay, enhanced bereavement leave and more generous severance entitlements. The Agreement provides for the mandatory flexibility and consultation terms at clauses 24 and 23 respectively, and a disputes resolution procedure at clause 25 provides for mediation and arbitration by an independent party. I am satisfied that the Agreement passes the BOOT.
[4] At a hearing of the application on 29 July 2014, Mr D Villani appeared for the applicant. Mr Villani outlined the main features of the Agreement and submitted that all of the legislative requirements for approval of the Agreement have been satisfied and the Agreement should be approved by the Commission. He explained that the Agreement was similar to a number of other enterprise agreements recently approved by the Commission which covered Bendigo and Adelaide Bank community banking franchises, except that rates of pay are to be increased by 2.5% each year throughout the nominal life of the Agreement, on the anniversary of the commencement of the Agreement rather than performance-based increases. He had calculated that Level 3 employees would be better off by at least $11.37 per fortnight and Level 4 employees would be better off by at least $18.30 per fortnight.
[5] Having heard the applicant’s submissions and upon reviewing the terms of the preapproval process documentation and the Agreement itself, I am satisfied that all of the requirements of the Act, in particular ss 180, 186, 187 and 188, in so far as relevant to this application, have been met. Accordingly, I approve a single enterprise agreement known as the Paynesville & District Financial Services Limited Enterprise Agreement 2014.Pursuant to s 54 of the Act, the Agreement shall operate from 5 August 2014 and have a nominal expiry date of 4 August 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code {G}, AE409368 PR553748>
- AGLC
- Paynesville & District Financial Services Limited [2014] FWCA 5175
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 5175
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the enterprise agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009, and if it adequately met the requirements for good faith bargaining and the coverage of the agreement. The court needed to assess whether the agreement was made in good faith, if it provided for a fair and efficient system of determining wages and other conditions of employment, and if it adhered to the protections afforded to employees under the Fair Work Act.
The court, after considering the submissions and evidence presented, determined that the enterprise agreement was made in good faith and met the statutory requirements. The agreement provided for a fair and efficient system for determining wages and other employment conditions, and it included appropriate protections for the employees. The court found that the agreement was comprehensive and covered all the necessary aspects required under the Fair Work Act. Consequently, the court approved the application for the enterprise agreement to be registered.
The final orders of the court included the approval and registration of the Paynesville & District Financial Services Limited Enterprise Agreement 2014, which became legally binding on the parties involved. The decision provided clarity and certainty regarding the terms and conditions of employment for the employees of Paynesville & District Financial Services Limited, ensuring that the agreement was in line with the legislative framework and protected the rights of both the employer and the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.