| IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA | |
| VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY | VG 7812 of 1997 |
BETWEEN: | PAUL A PATTISON (AS TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF GABOR HORVATH AND AGOTA HORVATH, BANKRUPTS) |
AND: | GABOR HORVATH AGOTA HORVATH GABOR HORVATH JUNIOR JULIJANA IVEGES |
JUDGE: | HEEREY J |
DATE: | 6 AUGUST 1998 |
PLACE: | MELBOURNE |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Amongst the property seized at the premises of the bankrupt were a number of pistols. These have now been placed in the custody of a licensed firearms dealer who holds them on behalf of the trustee, awaiting further directions. The bankrupts claim the pistols. Mrs Horvath deposed as follows:
“Those pistols are registered in my Husbands [sic] name Gabor Horvath and solely used by him for target shooting as he has been a member of the Pistol Club since 1973. Most of the Pistols are very old. They only have sentimental value.”
I accept this evidence. However, it does not take the pistols outside the definition of property divisible amongst creditors. Section 116(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) provides:
“Subject to this Act:
(a)all property that belonged to, or was vested in, a bankrupt at the commencement of the bankruptcy, or has been acquired or is acquired by him or her, or has devolved or devolves on him or her, after the commencement of the bankruptcy and before his or her discharge;
…
is property divisible amongst the creditors of the bankrupt”.
There are a number of exceptions but none are applicable in the present case since there is no doubt that the pistols were the property of Mr Horvath. It must follow that they are included in the property divisible amongst his creditors. I will therefore make orders in terms of the minutes which authorise the dealer to sell the firearms on behalf of the applicant. I will make an order in terms of the minutes which I will initial and place on the file.
| I certify that this and the preceding page are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Heerey |
Associate:
Dated: 6 August 1998
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr S Glacken |
| Solicitor for the Applicant: | Coltmans Price Brent |
| Counsel for the Respondents: | In person |
| Date of Hearing: | 6 August 1998 |
| Date of Judgment: | 6 August 1998 |
- AGLC
- Pattison, Paul a (as Trustee of the Property of Gabor Horvath and Anor, Bankrupts) v Horvath, Gabor [1998] FCA 960
- Case
- [1998] FCA 960
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue was whether the pistols, which were registered in Gabor's name and used for target shooting, were exempt from being classified as divisible property under the Bankruptcy Act 1966. Section 116(1) of the Act defines all property belonging to or vested in a bankrupt as property divisible amongst the creditors, unless an exception applies. The court had to consider if any of the exceptions to this rule applied in this case.
Justice Heerey found that the pistols were indeed property belonging to Gabor Horvath and therefore were subject to division among his creditors. The sentimental value and intended use of the pistols for target shooting did not exempt them from the definition of divisible property. Consequently, the court ordered that the firearms be sold on behalf of the applicant, the trustee of Gabor and Agata Horvath's bankruptcy. This decision was made on 6 August 1998.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.