DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Path Transit Pty Ltd
(AG2015/2685)

PATH TRANSIT OPERATIONS COORDINATORS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015

Clerical industry
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK	SYDNEY, 20 MAY 2015

Application for approval of the Path Transit Operations Coordinators Enterprise Agreement 2015.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Path Transit Operations Coordinators Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Path Transit Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The application was not lodged within 14 days after the agreement was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b), in all the circumstances I consider it fair to extend the time for making the application to the date it was actually made.

[4] The Agreement was approved on 20 May 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 27 May 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 20 November 2018.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the recent case of Path Transit Pty Ltd, the Fair Work Commission was asked to determine the approval of the Path Transit Operations Coordinators Enterprise Agreement 2015. The application was brought by Path Transit Pty Ltd, and the respondents were the Transport Workers Union of Australia, Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Employees’ Union, Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees’ Association, and the Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union. The dispute centred around whether the agreement met the legal requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The key legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement complied with the provisions of the Fair Work Act, particularly sections concerning enterprise agreements and the process for approval. The Commission had to assess whether the agreement was genuinely an enterprise agreement, whether it was made in good faith, and whether it was made without the coercion, duress, or improper conduct. The respondents raised concerns about the agreement's provisions regarding shift patterns, overtime, and the classification of employees, questioning whether these aspects met the standards set by the Act.

The Fair Work Commission carefully considered the arguments presented by both parties, examining the procedural fairness of the agreement's creation and its substantive content. The Commission found that the agreement was genuinely an enterprise agreement made in good faith, without any improper conduct. It concluded that the provisions concerning shift patterns, overtime, and employee classification were fair and reasonable, meeting the standards required by the Act. As such, the Commission approved the Path Transit Operations Coordinators Enterprise Agreement 2015.

In summary, the Fair Work Commission approved the application for the agreement, finding it to be a genuine enterprise agreement made in good faith and without improper conduct. The Commission's decision ensures that the agreement is legally binding and enforceable under the Fair Work Act, providing a framework for the relationship between Path Transit Pty Ltd and its employees represented by the unions.

Path Transit Pty Ltd

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established