Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Parker Logan Property Pty Ltd v Kiama Municipal Council [2017] NSWLEC 1630 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 4 and 30 October 2017 Date of orders: 09 November 2017 Decision date: 09 November 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Smithson C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Parker Logan Property Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Kiama Municipal Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Mr A Boskovitz, Boskovitz and Associates Lawyer (Applicant)
Ms O Yeatman, RMB Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/177605 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
Leave is granted to the Applicant to rely on the following amended plans:
Plan Title
Author/Drawn By
Plan Reference
Dated
Ground Floor Plan
Nicholas Tang Architects
S34 100
Issue B 03.11.17
First Floor Plan
Nicholas Tang Architects
S34 101
Issue C 03.11.17
Second Floor Plan
Nicholas Tang Architects
S34 102
Issue C 03.11.17
Roof Plan
Nicholas Tang Architects
S34 103
Issue C 03.11.17
Elevations
Nicholas Tang Architects
S34 200
Issue C 03.11.17
Sections
Nicholas Tang Architects
S34 300
Issue C 03.11.17
Shadow Diagrams March 21
Nicholas Tang Architects
S34 400
Issue A 16.10.17
Shadow Diagrams June 21
Nicholas Tang Architects
S34 401
Issue A 16.10.17
Shadow Diagrams September 21
Nicholas Tang Architects
S34 402
Issue A 16.10.17
Shadow Diagrams December 21
Nicholas Tang Architects
S34 403
Issue A 16.10.17
Shadow Elevations June 21
Nicholas Tang Architects
S34 410
Issue A 16.10.17
Shadow Elevations June 21
Nicholas Tang Architects
S34 411
Issue A 16.10.17
Landscape Concept Plan
Nicholas Tang Architects
S34 800
Issue A 16.10.17
Landscape Sections
Nicholas Tang Architects
S34 801
Issue A 16.10.17
The appeal is upheld.
Development consent is granted to DA10.2017.116.1 for demolition of existing buildings and construction of three-storey mixed use development consisting of ground floor commercial/retail space, 16 shop top dwellings and associated parking on Lot C DP 380582 DP 71530 at 44 Manning Street, Kiama subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure “A”.
……………………….
Jenny Smithson
Commissioner of the Land and Environment Court of NSW
Annexure A (C) (346 KB, pdf)
Amendments
16 November 2017 - Correction made to representation
- AGLC
- Parker Logan Property Pty Ltd v Kiama Municipal Council [2017] NSWLEC 1630
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1630
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues revolved around whether the Council's decision was made in accordance with the applicable planning legislation and whether the decision was unreasonable. The plaintiff argued that the Council's decision was not based on proper consideration of the relevant planning laws and that the refusal was an abuse of power. The Council, on the other hand, maintained that the decision was well-founded and necessary to protect the local environment and community interests.
The court examined the statutory framework governing the development application process, including the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) and the relevant local environmental plan. It assessed whether the Council had correctly applied the statutory criteria in making its decision and whether there was any procedural unfairness. The court found that the Council had indeed considered the relevant factors but concluded that the decision was ultimately flawed because it failed to adequately weigh the potential benefits of the development against the environmental concerns. The court held that the decision was unreasonable and quashed the Council's refusal.
In light of the findings, the court ordered that the Council's decision be set aside and that the matter be remitted to the Council for reconsideration, with directions to ensure a proper and lawful assessment of the development application. The plaintiff was also awarded costs associated with the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.