Palmer v CITIC Ltd [No 9]
Case
•
[2023] WASC 238
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Palmer v CITIC Ltd [No 9] [2023] WASC 238
[2023] WASC 238
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Supreme Court of Western Australia was asked to decide two sets of applications in the proceedings between Clive Frederick Palmer and Mineralogy Pty Ltd (the Mineralogy Parties) on one side and CITIC Ltd, Sino Iron Pty Ltd, and Korean Steel Pty Ltd (the CITIC Parties) on the other. The first set of applications were brought by the Mineralogy Parties seeking to be discharged from certain discovery obligations. The second set of applications were brought by the CITIC Parties seeking to vacate orders for a separate trial of quantum and to unify all matters for trial. The Mineralogy Parties consented to the unification applications but the question of costs remained. The court held that the applications to discharge discovery should be deferred until the pleadings had been clarified. In relation to the unification applications, the court held that the Mineralogy Parties should pay the CITIC Parties' costs of those applications. The court proposed to make orders extending the time for compliance with certain discovery categories and requiring the Mineralogy Parties to pay the CITIC Parties' costs of the unification applications.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Discovery & Disclosure
-
Costs
-
Interlocutory Orders
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Palmer v CITIC Ltd [No 17] [2025] WASC 224
Cases Citing This Decision
12
Palmer v CITIC Ltd [No 17]
[2025] WASC 224
Palmer v CITIC Ltd [No 14]
[2024] WASC 341
Palmer v CITIC Ltd [No 12]
[2024] WASC 322
Cases Cited
11
Statutory Material Cited
0
Palmer v CITIC Ltd
[2017] WASC 253
Palmer v CITIC Ltd [No 3]
[2019] WASC 424
Sino Iron Pty Ltd v Mineralogy Pty Ltd
[2022] WASC 151