Pacillo and Seales (No 3)
Case
•
[2014] FamCA 609
•22 July 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Pacillo and Seales (No 3) [2014] FamCA 609
[2014] FamCA 609
22 July 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Pacillo and Seales (No 3)*, Hannam J of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia considered the appropriate penalty for contraventions of a parenting order. The proceedings concerned allegations that the respondent mother had contravened orders made on 10 July 2014 concerning the parties' child.
The primary legal issue before the court was to determine the appropriate response to the proven contraventions of the parenting order. This involved considering the available sentencing options under the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) and applying them to the specific circumstances of the case.
Hannam J determined that the respondent should enter into a bond pursuant to section 112AF of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). The condition of this bond was that the respondent be of good behaviour for a period of eighteen months from the date of the order, with security of $500.00.
The primary legal issue before the court was to determine the appropriate response to the proven contraventions of the parenting order. This involved considering the available sentencing options under the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth) and applying them to the specific circumstances of the case.
Hannam J determined that the respondent should enter into a bond pursuant to section 112AF of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). The condition of this bond was that the respondent be of good behaviour for a period of eighteen months from the date of the order, with security of $500.00.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Sentencing
-
Penalty
-
Charge
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1