| [2015] FWCA 8937 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Pacific National (QLD) Pty Ltd
(AG2015/6298)
PACIFIC NATIONAL (QLD) INTERMODAL TRAIN CREW ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Rail industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT ASBURY | BRISBANE, 24 DECEMBER 2015 |
Application for approval of the Pacific National (QLD) Intermodal Train Crew Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] Pacific National (QLD) Pty Ltd applies for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Pacific National (QLD) Intermodal Train Crew Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that the organisations wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] As the consultation term does not meet the requirements of s.205 of the Act, pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement and operates in conjunction with the consultation term agreed by the parties (clause 43 and schedule 2 of the Agreement).
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 31 December 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE417273 PR575448>
- AGLC
- Pacific National (QLD) Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 8937
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 8937
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission first considered whether the agreement satisfied the "better off overall test," which requires that employees under the agreement be no worse off financially than they would be under the applicable award. The applicant presented evidence that the agreement provided for improved terms and conditions for the employees, including enhanced pay and conditions, which were better than those provided for in the applicable award. The Commission also examined whether the agreement contained any provisions that could potentially undermine the public interest, such as provisions that would permit activities that are illegal or that would otherwise be considered unethical. The Commission found that the agreement did not contain any such provisions and was in compliance with all relevant legislation.
In reaching its decision, the Commission was satisfied that the agreement met all the statutory criteria for approval. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for improved terms and conditions for employees and was no worse off financially than they would be under the applicable award. The Commission also found that the agreement did not contain any provisions that could potentially undermine the public interest. The Commission therefore approved the agreement and made it applicable to the employees of the applicant. This decision provides clarity for employers and employees alike, ensuring that any enterprise agreements entered into are in compliance with the relevant legislation and provide for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.