Pacific Brands Holdings Pty Ltd Summary

[2014] FWCA 2810

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Pacific Brands Holdings Pty Ltd
(AG2014/897)

PACIFIC BRANDS SUPPLY CHAIN QLD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014

Storage services
COMMISSIONER ROE	MELBOURNE, 29 APRIL 2014

Application for approval of the Pacific Brands Supply Chain Qld Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Pacific Brands Supply Chain Qld Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Pacific Brands Holdings Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer however taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[3] The National Union of Workers and the Textile, Clothing and Footwear Union of Australia have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the two organisations.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 6 May 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 18 February 2017.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Pacific Brands Holdings Pty Ltd sought approval of an enterprise agreement from the Fair Work Commission. The dispute involved the proposed terms and conditions of employment for employees within the Queensland supply chain of Pacific Brands. The case was heard in the Federal Court of Australia. The primary legal issue before the court was whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the court had to determine if the agreement met the requirements for good faith bargaining and if it provided for appropriate processes to resolve disputes between the parties.

The court examined whether the negotiation process adhered to the principles of genuine and meaningful negotiation as mandated by the Fair Work Act. Pacific Brands argued that the agreement was the product of such a process, while the opposing party raised concerns about the fairness of the negotiations and the adequacy of the dispute resolution provisions. The court considered the evidence provided by both parties, including the conduct of negotiations, the content of the agreement, and any relevant legislative and regulatory requirements. It found that while there were some procedural issues, the overall process was consistent with good faith bargaining and the agreement did provide for appropriate mechanisms to resolve disputes.

The court concluded that the enterprise agreement complied with the statutory requirements and approved it. The decision highlighted the importance of genuine negotiation and the need for adequate dispute resolution provisions. The court's approval of the agreement allowed for its implementation, setting out the terms and conditions of employment for the employees within the Queensland supply chain of Pacific Brands. The final orders of the court confirmed the approval of the enterprise agreement and its provisions.

Pacific Brands Holdings Pty Ltd

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established