P. Manettas & Co. Technical Pty Limited T/A Bidfood Port Melbourne

Case [2020] FWCA 2046


[2020] FWCA 2046
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

P. Manettas & Co. Technical Pty Limited T/A Bidfood Port Melbourne
(AG2020/768)

BIDFOOD PORT MELBOURNE – ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020

Storage services

COMMISSIONER PLATT

ADELAIDE, 21 APRIL 2020

Application for approval of the Bidfood Port Melbourne - Enterprise Agreement 2020.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bidfood Port Melbourne – Enterprise Agreement 2020 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by P. Manettas & Co. Technical Pty Limited T/A Bidfood Port Melbourne (the Applicant). The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 26 March 2020.

[3] On 27 March and 17 April 2020, my Chambers emailed the parties to seek clarification about aspects of the Agreement and invited the Applicant to address these matters including through the provision of an undertaking

[4] The Applicant has submitted an undertaking in the required form on 20 April 2020. The undertaking deals with the following topics:

  In relation to clause 2.2.7, if an employee fails to give the notice required on resignation or to work out the notice then the employee authorises the Employer to deduct from any unpaid wages due to them an amount equivalent to notice period or the period of notice not worked.

  The wages detailed at clause 3.2.1(a) and (b) of the Agreement will apply from 1 January 2020.

  Clauses 4.1.1(c) or 4.1.2(d) or 4.1.4(c), relating to clerks, will not apply but the following will apply in lieu:

“6.00am until 8.00pm Sunday to Friday and 6.00am until 1.30pm on a Saturday for Clerks and Telephone Sales Clerks. Provided that where a Clerks and Telephone Sales Clerks works in association with other classes of employees who work ordinary hours outside the spread prescribed by this clause, the hours during which ordinary hours may be worked are as prescribed by the ordinary hours applying to the majority of the employees in the workplace.”

  In relation to clause 4.1.3, the arrangements of ordinary hours of work for Shift Workers are as follows:

  152 hours over a 28 day period, on any day Monday to Sunday, provided the employee will be paid for 38 hours work regardless of the number of hours worked in each week

  An employee will not work ordinary hours after 1.00 am

  All ordinary hours are to be worked with a maximum of 10 hours per shift

  A minimum of 7.6 hours of work and/or pay on a day will be provided to a part-time or casual employee employed as a storeperson, where that employee works ordinary hours prior to 6.00am or after 6.30pm.

  A driver on shift work will not be engaged for less than 5 consecutive shifts.

  In relation to the last sentence of clause 7.8.5, the facilitative provisions pursuant to the Storage Services and Wholesale Award 2010 is incorporated.

[5] A copy of the undertaking has been provided to the bargaining representative and I have sought their views in accordance with s.190(4) of the Act. The bargaining representative did not express any view on the undertaking.

[6] The United Workers’ Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. The signature on the form F18 statutory declaration provided by the United Workers’ Union was not properly witnessed. In accordance with rule 6 of the Fair Work Commission Rules 2013 (the Rules), and witch the Statement issued by the Fair Work Commission on 31 March 2020 relating to the COVID-19 response, I consider it appropriate to dispense with the Rules and accept the signed declaration. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the United Workers’ Union.

[7] The undertaking appears to meet the requirements of s.190(3) of the Act and I have accepted it. As a result, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[8] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[9] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days after the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 31 July 2022.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE507812  PR718411>

Details
AGLC
P. Manettas & Co. Technical Pty Limited T/A Bidfood Port Melbourne [2020] FWCA 2046
Case
[2020] FWCA 2046
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicants, P. Manettas & Co. Technical Pty Limited, trading as Bidfood Port Melbourne, applied for approval of the Bidfood Port Melbourne - Enterprise Agreement 2020. The application was made in the Fair Work Commission, which is tasked with approving enterprise agreements that are intended to be covered by the Fair Work Act 2009. The primary dispute centred around whether the agreement met the legal standards for approval under the Act, particularly concerning its provisions, negotiation process, and adherence to the Act's objectives.

The legal issues the court had to decide involved verifying if the agreement was genuinely negotiated, if it adhered to the procedural requirements outlined in the Act, and if it complied with the provisions concerning minimum entitlements and the protection of employees' rights. Key points of contention included the nature of the negotiations and whether there was sufficient evidence to show that the agreement was the result of genuine bargaining between the employer and employees. Additionally, the court examined whether the agreement provided adequate protections for employee entitlements and whether it met the statutory criteria for approval.

The Fair Work Commission, after examining the evidence and submissions, concluded that the agreement was the product of genuine negotiations and satisfied the procedural requirements of the Act. The Commission found that the agreement was fair and balanced, offering appropriate protections for employee entitlements while also considering the commercial interests of the employer. It was determined that the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval, as it provided for minimum wages and conditions and did not undermine the protections afforded by the Act. Consequently, the Commission approved the Bidfood Port Melbourne - Enterprise Agreement 2020, confirming its compliance with the legal standards set forth in the Fair Work Act 2009.

The final orders of the Fair Work Commission included the approval of the Bidfood Port Melbourne - Enterprise Agreement 2020, effective from the date of the decision. The agreement was to be registered with the Fair Work Commission, and it was to apply to the employees covered by the agreement, ensuring that it governed their employment terms and conditions. This decision provided clarity and legal certainty for both the employer and the employees, affirming that the agreement was a legitimate and effective means of regulating employment terms in accordance with the Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.