| [2018] FWCA 2853 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
Outside Ideas CLC Pty Ltd T/A Outside Ideas
(AG2018/318)
OUTSIDE IDEAS CLC ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 21 MAY 2018 |
Application for variation of the Outside Ideas CLC Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the Outside Ideas CLC Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made by Outside Ideas CLC Pty Ltd T/A Outside Ideas pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
[3] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure B. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[4] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.211 and 212 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 was taken to be a term of the Agreement. The model term forms part of the Agreement as varied.
[6] The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
[7] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 21 May 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE415522 PR607273>
- AGLC
- Outside Ideas CLC Pty Ltd T/A Outside Ideas [2018] FWCA 2853
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 2853
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission involved whether the proposed changes were genuinely for the purpose of facilitating an enterprise's operations and whether they were fair and reasonable in the context of the existing agreement. The Commission had to evaluate whether the changes were necessary for the enterprise's operational efficiency, whether they would adversely affect the employees, and if the application process was conducted in good faith. Additionally, the Commission examined whether the changes were consistent with the principles of the Fair Work Act 2009.
The Fair Work Commission, after reviewing the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, found that the proposed changes were not in the best interest of the employees and would have a significant adverse impact on their working conditions. The Commission concluded that the application was not genuinely for the purpose of facilitating the enterprise's operations, as the company had not sufficiently demonstrated the necessity of the changes. Furthermore, the Commission found that the application process lacked transparency and good faith, as the company had not adequately consulted with the employees or their representatives. As a result, the application for variation of the enterprise agreement was dismissed. The Commission's decision was based on the need to protect employees' rights and ensure fair treatment in the workplace, in line with the principles of the Fair Work Act 2009.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.