Osferatu and Osferatu

In the matter of *Osferatu and Osferatu*, heard before Le Poer Trench J, the wife sought to strike out paragraph 304 of the husband's affidavit. The precise nature of the underlying dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided text, but the application concerned the admissibility or relevance of the content within that specific paragraph of the husband's sworn evidence.

The central legal issue before the court was whether paragraph 304 of the husband's affidavit was admissible in the proceedings. This required an assessment of its relevance and potential prejudice, or whether it otherwise offended the rules of evidence or procedure in family law matters.

Le Poer Trench J upheld the wife's objection, ordering that paragraph 304 of the husband's affidavit be struck out. This indicates the court found the content of that paragraph to be inadmissible, likely due to a lack of relevance, being an improper form of evidence, or for other reasons that rendered it unsuitable for consideration in the case.