Orontes and Somoza (No. 2)
Case
•
[2018] FamCA 868
•14 September 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Orontes and Somoza (No. 2) [2018] FamCA 868
[2018] FamCA 868
14 September 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Orontes and Somoza (No. 2)*, Benjamin J of the Family Court of Australia considered parenting orders concerning a child born in 2006. The dispute involved the mother, Ms Somoza, and the father, Mr Orontes, regarding the arrangements for their child.
The court was required to determine the future living arrangements for the child, the nature of parental responsibility, and the extent and nature of the father's contact with the child. Specific issues included whether the father should be prohibited from attending the child's school and the terms under which any future contact between the father and child should occur, particularly in light of the need for a safe environment.
Benjamin J discharged all previous parenting orders and ordered that the child live with the mother, with both parents to have equal shared parental responsibility. The father was prohibited from attending the child's school without consent. Crucially, for a period of twelve months, the father was permitted to arrange supervised contact with the child for up to one hour on six occasions, facilitated through Child Dispute Services, provided the child was willing to attend. No other orders for time or communication were made, with the court noting the particulars of obligations and consequences of contravention in an attached Fact Sheet. The appointment of the Independent Children’s Lawyer was extended for twelve months by consent.
The court was required to determine the future living arrangements for the child, the nature of parental responsibility, and the extent and nature of the father's contact with the child. Specific issues included whether the father should be prohibited from attending the child's school and the terms under which any future contact between the father and child should occur, particularly in light of the need for a safe environment.
Benjamin J discharged all previous parenting orders and ordered that the child live with the mother, with both parents to have equal shared parental responsibility. The father was prohibited from attending the child's school without consent. Crucially, for a period of twelve months, the father was permitted to arrange supervised contact with the child for up to one hour on six occasions, facilitated through Child Dispute Services, provided the child was willing to attend. No other orders for time or communication were made, with the court noting the particulars of obligations and consequences of contravention in an attached Fact Sheet. The appointment of the Independent Children’s Lawyer was extended for twelve months by consent.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Costs
-
Consent
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0