| [2015] FWCA 6872 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Origin Energy Limited
(AG2015/5759)
ORIGIN ENERGY (LPG WESTERN AUSTRALIA) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Plumbing industry | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | SYDNEY, 7 OCTOBER 2015 |
Application for approval of the Origin Energy (LPG Western Australia) Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Origin Energy (LPG Western Australia) Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Origin Energy Limited. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[3] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 7 October 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 14 October 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE416029 PR572623>
- AGLC
- Origin Energy Limited [2015] FWCA 6872
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 6872
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues that the Commission had to address involved assessing whether the agreement adhered to the procedural fairness requirements, whether it satisfied the "better off overall test" (BOOT), and whether it complied with the good faith bargaining obligations under the Act. The Commission needed to ensure that the agreement was not only fair but also met the statutory criteria for approval. Additionally, the Commission examined whether the agreement contained provisions that could be considered as potentially discriminatory or unjust.
The Commission determined that the application met all necessary criteria for approval. It found that the agreement was the product of good faith bargaining and was procedurally fair. The Commission further found that the proposed agreement provided employees with outcomes that were better off overall compared to their previous conditions. The agreement was found to be compliant with all relevant statutory requirements, and thus, the Commission approved the enterprise agreement. The decision was made in the interest of ensuring fair and just working conditions for the employees while also respecting the legal framework governing enterprise agreements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.