[2014] FWCA 4398 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Orica Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2014/764)
ORICA AUSTRALIA PTY LTD HEYBRIDGE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Tasmania | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 1 JULY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Orica Australia Pty Ltd Heybridge Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Orica Australia Pty Ltd Heybridge Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made by Orica Australia Pty Ltd pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings given is attached to this decision at Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] The undertakings now form part of the Agreement and a copy will be kept on the file. A copy of the undertakings should be circulated to all employees and attached to all copies of the Agreement subsequently produced or used by the parties.
[4] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia and United Voice have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[6] The Agreement is approved, and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 8 July 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 September 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Annexure A:
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE408888 PR552657>
- AGLC
- Orica Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 4398
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 4398
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission evaluated the process of bargaining, including whether there was genuine negotiation and if the agreement was genuinely agreed upon by both parties. Additionally, the court examined the content of the agreement to ensure it did not disadvantage employees by setting terms below the minimum standards. The Commission found that the bargaining process was conducted in good faith and that the agreement was genuinely negotiated. Furthermore, the content of the agreement was assessed against the statutory minimum terms and conditions, and it was concluded that the agreement did not unfairly disadvantage employees.
Following this assessment, the Fair Work Commission approved the Heybridge Enterprise Agreement 2014. The Commission determined that the agreement was made in compliance with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and that it provided fair terms and conditions for the employees. The decision underscored the importance of genuine negotiation and the adherence to statutory minimum standards in enterprise agreements. The approval marked the formal recognition of the agreement as a binding instrument governing the employment conditions at the Heybridge site.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.