Opposition by Vina Concha y Toro S.A to registration of trade mark application number 1881847 (class 33) - OCHO TORO - in the name of Gregory Hall
Case
•
[2021] ATMO 13
•24 February 2021
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Opposition by Vina Concha y Toro S.A to registration of trade mark application number 1881847 (class 33) - OCHO TORO - in the name of Gregory Hall [2021] ATMO 13
[2021] ATMO 13
24 February 2021
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an opposition by Vina Concha y Toro S.A. to the registration of the trade mark application number 1881847, OCHO TORO, in Class 33, filed by Gregory Hall. The opposition was heard by Timothy Brown.
The legal issues before the court were whether the grounds of opposition, brought under sections 52, 42(b), 44, and 60 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth), had been established. The opponent contended that the proposed mark should not be registered due to these grounds.
The court found that the opponent had not established any of the nominated grounds of opposition. The opponent, a Chilean wine producer, relied on its extensive use of the CONCHA Y TORO trade mark in Australia and internationally, as well as its ownership of various trade mark registrations. However, the court determined that the evidence did not support the opponent's claims under the relevant sections of the Act. Consequently, the trade mark application was permitted to proceed to registration. The court also ordered that costs be awarded against the opponent, as they were unsuccessful in their opposition.
The legal issues before the court were whether the grounds of opposition, brought under sections 52, 42(b), 44, and 60 of the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth), had been established. The opponent contended that the proposed mark should not be registered due to these grounds.
The court found that the opponent had not established any of the nominated grounds of opposition. The opponent, a Chilean wine producer, relied on its extensive use of the CONCHA Y TORO trade mark in Australia and internationally, as well as its ownership of various trade mark registrations. However, the court determined that the evidence did not support the opponent's claims under the relevant sections of the Act. Consequently, the trade mark application was permitted to proceed to registration. The court also ordered that costs be awarded against the opponent, as they were unsuccessful in their opposition.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Standing
-
Remedies
-
Costs
-
Appeal
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
23
Statutory Material Cited
0
Malibu Boats West Inc v Catanese
[2000] FCA 1141
Malibu Boats West Inc v Catanese
[2000] FCA 1141
Malibu Boats West Inc v Catanese
[2000] FCA 1141