OP v HM
Case
•
[2002] FamCA 454
•27 June 2002
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
OP v HM [2002] FamCA 454
[2002] FamCA 454
27 June 2002
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia, comprising Kay, Coleman, and Rose JJ, considered an appeal concerning a dispute between OP and HM. The precise nature of the dispute is not detailed in the provided text, but it formed the subject of the appeal before the Full Court.
The central legal issues before the Full Court were not explicitly stated in the provided text. However, the judgment of Kay, Coleman, and Rose JJ indicates that the Court was required to determine questions of law arising from the original dispute between OP and HM.
The reasoning of the Full Court and the legal principles it applied are not discernible from the limited text provided. The judgment was delivered by Kay, Coleman, and Rose JJ.
The final orders or outcome of the appeal are not set out in the provided text.
The central legal issues before the Full Court were not explicitly stated in the provided text. However, the judgment of Kay, Coleman, and Rose JJ indicates that the Court was required to determine questions of law arising from the original dispute between OP and HM.
The reasoning of the Full Court and the legal principles it applied are not discernible from the limited text provided. The judgment was delivered by Kay, Coleman, and Rose JJ.
The final orders or outcome of the appeal are not set out in the provided text.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Natural Justice
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
OP v HM [2002] FamCA 454
Most Recent Citation
Saso & Saso (No 5) [2025] FedCFamC2F 692
Cases Citing This Decision
12
Sinha and Sinha and Ors
[2015] FamCA 109
Kildea & Kildea (No. 2)
[2007] FamCA 1658
Kildea & Kildea (No. 2)
[2007] FamCA 1658
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0